They call them "Buddy Flics." Two guys are placed
by the screenwriter into a partnership that becomes the primary thread that
carries the action of the movie. Think Abbott and Costello, Laurel and
Hardy, Gibson and Glover (Lethal Weapon), Dean Martin and Jerry Lewis, and
Matthau and Lemmon (Odd Couple) amongst dozens of others. These were magical
partnerships that would propel the couple through adventures and escapades
(often quite messy and later bloody – but almost always humorous). It is the
quintessential Hollywood vehicle for storytelling.
Concurrent to the male-male story, the mixed Buddy Film
emerged with couples such as Nick and Nora Charles (Thin Man series and other
films), Humphrey Bogart and Lauren Bacall (not necessarily a series but a
couple that sparked sexual energy and box office dollars), and of course Ginger
Rogers and Fred Astaire. The sexual nuance could now be employed with, in most
cases, the woman equal to the man (and often smarter). And who can forget Mickey
and Minnie.
Thelma and Louise changed the roles to a darker side, two
women out for a good time that goes bad. While the genre could be two women it
has to have two strong actors and a great story to pull it off. There not many
to choose from.
In the modern era, literature has used this vehicle to carry
a story since Don Quixote and Sancho Panza rode across the Spanish Plain. Sir
Arthur Conan Doyle's Sherlock Holmes and Dr. Watson, Dashiell Hammett used it
in his Thin Man series (books and screenplays), and Steinbeck's Of Mice and
Men.
The goal of today's mystery and thriller writer is to use
this archetype to inject conflict, humor, and movement to the story. It is
seldom used in the first person telling of the story, the "I said and then
you responded," can be confusing. The Lone Wolf character seldom needs a
partner – Jack Reacher works alone (in Lee Child's stories Reacher "bumps"
into characters for the action). The greatest purpose of the Buddy Book is to
draw out the two main characters in ways that the action of the story can't. In
David Baldacci's King and Maxwell series (six books and counting) we have an
older man (ex-Secret Service) and a younger woman teamed as detectives. They
bitch and moan at each other, name call, and otherwise act like any married
couple except they aren't. The action of the story is paired with a soft sexual
tension that pervades their conversations – the "will they or won’t they"
is placed in the mind of the reader as the two act to save the president of the
United States, oh-hum (actually a great read).
The writer can structure their books with a main character
and subordinates (I call it the office model – boss and minions), lone wolf
with casual walk-on/die off guests, Buddy (man-man, man-woman, man/woman-pet
(ouch), and woman-woman), or in the case of some very strange works of fiction
a robot or car (think Stephen King). All character structures work but it is
often found that with a partnership the writer can further develop and deepen the
characters. The reader may more easily identify with one or the other of the
leads, especially in a man-woman structure. It also allows for a broader
relationship to the marketplace – guys for guys and gals for gals – or the
switch to guys for the sexy successful gal and gals for sexy unstoppable hunk
of a guy. Just saying.
I've found in my Sharon O'Mara and Kevin Bryan stories my
two characters just want to bust out in each book. Each wants top billing (at
least in my head) and I have to continually push Kevin back since it is Sharon's chronicles. I try to balance
them with the number of words each is entitled to, and I have found that Sharon
needs to learn to share. For some buddies sharing is tough.
Every writer I've met that writes buddies is faced with the
same conundrum: Do I keep the same model or will I, in the next book, switch
the roles of the partners? More than once, such as in the Stephen Coonts Jake
Grafton stories, Tommy Carmellini (the quasi-partner) wants to tell his story
too. It is an all to often problem, think Rhoda from Mary Tyler Moore and
Frasier from Cheers (okay a stretch but you get my drift). But when you
spin-off one buddy who becomes their buddy? Just asking.
More later . . . . . . . .
No comments:
Post a Comment